<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IBM to Switch to MacBook?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gadgetmaniac.mail2web.com/2008/04/ibm-to-switch-to-macbook/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gadgetmaniac.mail2web.com/2008/04/ibm-to-switch-to-macbook/</link>
	<description>Cool Gadgets and Beyond</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 23:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: services.mail2web.com &#124; Gadget Blog &#124;</title>
		<link>http://gadgetmaniac.mail2web.com/2008/04/ibm-to-switch-to-macbook/#comment-30644</link>
		<dc:creator>services.mail2web.com &#124; Gadget Blog &#124;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 17:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gadgetmaniac.mail2web.com/2008/04/ibm-to-switch-to-macbook/#comment-30644</guid>
		<description>[...] be a trend - a while ago MacBooks were spotted at IBM. Image thx to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] be a trend - a while ago MacBooks were spotted at IBM. Image thx to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apple Mania: I Don&#8217;t Get It &#124; Off Hours</title>
		<link>http://gadgetmaniac.mail2web.com/2008/04/ibm-to-switch-to-macbook/#comment-29769</link>
		<dc:creator>Apple Mania: I Don&#8217;t Get It &#124; Off Hours</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 03:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gadgetmaniac.mail2web.com/2008/04/ibm-to-switch-to-macbook/#comment-29769</guid>
		<description>[...] with a 13 inch screen. Nice way to force MacBook Pro purchases. That means a no go. It&#8217;s just not a smart economic decision for a better, but not vastly superior [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] with a 13 inch screen. Nice way to force MacBook Pro purchases. That means a no go. It&#8217;s just not a smart economic decision for a better, but not vastly superior [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
