<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mitsubishi LaserVue Laser TV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gadgetmaniac.mail2web.com/2008/04/mitsubishi-laservue-laser-tv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gadgetmaniac.mail2web.com/2008/04/mitsubishi-laservue-laser-tv/</link>
	<description>Cool Gadgets and Beyond</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 17:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Laser TVs</title>
		<link>http://gadgetmaniac.mail2web.com/2008/04/mitsubishi-laservue-laser-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-35673</link>
		<dc:creator>Laser TVs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 12:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gadgetmaniac.mail2web.com/2008/04/mitsubishi-laservue-laser-tv/#comment-35673</guid>
		<description>I know, the wait has been two years and that is a good 600 days too much!

I'm seriously looking forward to it. But the fact that the smallest is 65" has serious implications for me - I'll need a bigger house to fit it in. And not entirely sure who'll go for the 73" model!! Bonkers if you ask me!

Lee</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know, the wait has been two years and that is a good 600 days too much!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m seriously looking forward to it. But the fact that the smallest is 65&#8243; has serious implications for me - I&#8217;ll need a bigger house to fit it in. And not entirely sure who&#8217;ll go for the 73&#8243; model!! Bonkers if you ask me!</p>
<p>Lee</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
